RAI
Well-known member
Very disconcerting. But at the moment only Belgium and Germany are making an offense out of having a non compliant radio. In the Netherlands, the offence is transmitting not owning.
Yes I don’t understand that. It is completely mad, it would be so sensible if you could change you radio from U.K. to say Dutch ND GET aITS etc then change is back to U.K. and get M1 and M2 and so on. i bet there is some stupid regulation about this.I'd be curious what the wording of that offence is. My radio (B&G V60B) can be compliant if set to the correct region, but the region cannot be changed by the user.
That was what I was reading, and that a boat over 7m requires a radio hence the reason I'm looking, though the local bridge that requires opening to pass you call them up on GSM rather than VHF.Very disconcerting. But at the moment only Belgium and Germany are making an offense out of having a non compliant radio. In the Netherlands, the offence is transmitting not owning.
Not a requirement for me luckily, I do however have a Yaesu FT895D as a radio ham that is HF, VHF and UHF on the ham bands. The other thing that strikes me is that you cannot have dual watch never mind, god forbid, scanning. I did look at a Standard Horizon which can be set to US/Canada, UK, or Atis by the user, SH have not got back to me about VDES yet.Yes I don’t understand that. It is completely mad, it would be so sensible if you could change you radio from U.K. to say Dutch ND GET aITS etc then change is back to U.K. and get M1 and M2 and so on. i bet there is some stupid regulation about this.
There are other stupid regulations did you know you cannot buy an SSB radios that also has VHF you have to buy one of each if you want an SSB.
SH have not got back to me about VDES yet.
Lower masts. VHF is line of sight.I got a very prompt answer from BIPT. They are leading the world because they and the Dutch are very short of spectrum capacity for both Antwerp and Rotterdam. They are in VHF range of each other so must share the limited resources. So they want the ether free from unwanted traffic from our transceivers.
So expect other countries to start demanding the changes before long.
I have not noticed a lack of channels when ATIS is enabled. Which ones have you lost?We've since purchased a handheld SH HX300E which was picked specifically as non-DSC radio for use from the cockpit in the Dutch canals... only to find that once ATIS is enabled, the radio effectively becomes useless due to the lack of channels available! )
Ah, that's interesting. I'll come back to you with an answer when I'm next onboard. Perhaps it's operator error after all!I have not noticed a lack of channels when ATIS is enabled. Which ones have you lost?
The ship station keeps the current full set of channels. Handheld radios are limited in both frequencies and power, under RAINWAT rules.I have not noticed a lack of channels when ATIS is enabled. Which ones have you lost?
I can't find any mention in the RAINWALT rules of handhelds required to have limited channels/frequencies. Can you post a link to the relevant section/attachment please?The ship station keeps the current full set of channels. Handheld radios are limited in both frequencies and power, under RAINWAT rules.
http://www.danubecommission.org/upl...ement Bucuresti, revised 3 April 2013 - E.pdfI can't find any mention in the RAINWALT rules of handhelds required to have limited channels/frequencies. Can you post a link to the relevant section/attachment please?
Thanks. I am glad I am not one of the authorities that has agreed to comply with that document. I can see several contradictions regarding handhelds.http://www.danubecommission.org/uploads/doc/publication/Rainwat 2013/Arrangement Bucuresti, revised 3 April 2013 - E.pdf
Annex 3 Section 3.
Google is your friend.